if you are in a court of law an you look at this and this is different evidence, what is your sense of where the evidence is leading? >> kimberly: when you look at it, it appears that the majority. when you aggregate it, it points in one direction. the president, the administration, the state department, command centers, situation room, they were able to get streaming video. drones overhead and certain consistent facts that show they knew they were in loop. basically, the president within an hour or so of the attack was able to see everything, understand what was going on an quite clear it was an act of terrorism. by al-qaeda affiliateed group. so when you see that, they are trying to put it off after the election, because it's costly to him politically to have then made contradictory statements in weeks that follow. not only himself, but people in his administration. including ambassador rice. >> bob: you just said the president of the united states saw everything and knew everything in an hour. that's flat wrong. >> kimberly: i didn't say he saw everything. he knew w the president of